For law-enforcement & emergency-response agencies

Critical incident chat, ready in minutes

Secure, single-use channels for multi-jurisdictional incidents. Spin one up, invite the right people, and it's gone when the incident is.

Built around how agencies actually work, not a chat app retrofitted for compliance.

Row-level tenant isolation

Enforced by Postgres row-level security on every query, not application-level filtering.

Single-use, auto-expiring channels

Each channel is created for one incident and can't be reopened once it's closed.

CJIS Security Policy-aligned

Access control, audit logging, and encryption aligned to CJIS Security Policy requirements.

Product

Everything scoped to the incident, nothing left over

The two things that matter most in a live multi-agency response, front and center, with structured records and integrations layered on underneath.

Single-use incident channels

Spin up a channel per incident. Participants join through a single-use invite link. No accounts, no public sign-up, nothing left over once the incident ends.

Multi-agency, fully isolated

Every agency manages its own admins, users, channels, and invites. Row-level isolation keeps one agency's incidents invisible to every other.

Layered underneath

Live subject record

A shared document alongside the chat. Photo, identity, contact, address, and vehicle, with per-participant edit permissions your admins control.

ALPR & vendor integrations

Automated plate-read hits routed directly into the right channel, for those who need to know when they need to know. No per-vendor accounts required.

How it works

From dispatch to after-action, in three steps

1

Create the channel

An Agency Admin opens a channel for the incident. It's scoped, timestamped, and tied to their agency from the first message.

2

Invite the right people

Outside units join with a single-use code, no account required. Editing rights on the subject record are delegated by the creator.

3

Close it out

The creator ends the incident, captures the after-action outcome, and exports the full record. The channel can't be reopened or reused.

Case study

Real incidents, the tooling that was actually used

Agency, state and date withheld at the agencies' request.

Multi-state pursuitAfter-action review · 01

Single point of failure

4+AGENCIES COORDINATING
1SPRAWLING EMAIL THREAD
3STATE LINES CROSSED
Read the full after-action account

A domestic disturbance call led to a suspect fleeing across state lines, crossing three separate jurisdictions in a single incident. During a traffic stop, the responding officer was dragged by the fleeing vehicle. The suspect eluded a second stop before ties to a third state were identified.

What followed was coordination across four-plus agencies: the originating state, the state where the officer was injured, the state with the suspect's ties, local municipal detectives, and federal partners who joined as the case developed. The primary coordination tool was a single, sprawling email thread.

As more agencies joined, updates got buried in reply-alls. Time-sensitive leads sat unread or got lost in a thread organized around whoever replied last, not the incident itself.

This wasn't a training failure, it was structural. There was no shared, real-time channel built for the specific incident, accessible to exactly the people working it, with a subject record that updated in one place instead of a new PDF attached to every email.

“As new information on the suspect came in, someone had to compile it, format it into a PDF, and email it out to everyone on the case. Agencies working off an outdated PDF wasn't a hypothetical risk, it was the default condition.”
From the after-action review
Child abduction responseAfter-action review · 02

A race against fragmented information

14+EMAIL THREADS
20+PHONE CALLS
Read the full after-action account

A young child was abducted by an unknown male. Shortly after, the suspect began making threats against the child's life. The suspect's identity was developed quickly, but the vehicle he was operating remained unknown, leaving investigators working against the clock with a critical gap in the picture.

The scale of the response escalated fast. Multiple levels of command needed real-time visibility, and state and federal agencies joined as the case developed. Every person involved needed the latest information immediately to make decisions, and make them fast.

Coordination happened across more than a dozen separate email threads and over twenty phone calls. Information was scattered across threads and phone logs instead of living in one place everyone could see.

This wasn't a lack of effort, it was a tooling gap. Phone calls and email threads simply cannot keep pace with a fast-moving case involving a threat to a child's life. A missed call could mean a time delay in getting the vehicle description. A buried email could mean a delayed decision.

“Calls were constantly getting cut off because someone else was calling in with what might have been more critical information. Investigators were forced to choose between finishing one conversation or answering the call that might contain the lead that mattered.”
From the after-action review
Get started

Ready to bring your agencies onto one channel?

Talk to us

Tell us about your agency, we'll follow up within one business day.

Use your agency email address if you have one.